Wiktionary:Tinget/13
FileExporter beta feature rediger
A new beta feature will soon be released on all wikis: The FileExporter. It allows exports of files from a local wiki to Wikimedia Commons, including their file history and page history. Which files can be exported is defined by each wiki's community: Please check your wiki's configuration file if you want to use this feature.
The FileExporter has already been a beta feature on mediawiki.org, meta.wikimedia, deWP, faWP, arWP, koWP and on wikisource.org. After some functionality was added, it's now becoming a beta feature on all wikis. Deployment is planned for January 16. More information can be found on the project page.
As always, feedback is highly appreciated. If you want to test the FileExporter, please activate it in your user preferences. The best place for feedback is the central talk page. Thank you from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes project.
No editing for 30 minutes on 17 January rediger
16. jan. 2019 kl. 19:52 (CET)
Talk to us about talking rediger
The Wikimedia Foundation is planning a global consultation about communication. The goal is to bring Wikimedians and wiki-minded people together to improve tools for communication.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis, whatever their experience, their skills or their devices.
We are looking for input from as many different parts of the Wikimedia community as possible. It will come from multiple projects, in multiple languages, and with multiple perspectives.
We are currently planning the consultation. We need your help.
We need volunteers to help talk to their communities or user groups.
You can help by hosting a discussion at your wiki. Here's what to do:
- First, sign up your group here.
- Next, create a page (or a section on a Village pump, or an e-mail thread – whatever is natural for your group) to collect information from other people in your group. This is not a vote or decision-making discussion: we are just collecting feedback.
- Then ask people what they think about communication processes. We want to hear stories and other information about how people communicate with each other on and off wiki. Please consider asking these five questions:
- When you want to discuss a topic with your community, what tools work for you, and what problems block you?
- What about talk pages works for newcomers, and what blocks them?
- What do others struggle with in your community about talk pages?
- What do you wish you could do on talk pages, but can't due to the technical limitations?
- What are the important aspects of a "wiki discussion"?
- Finally, please go to Talk pages consultation 2019 on Mediawiki.org and report what you learned from your group. Please include links if the discussion is available to the public.
You can also help build the list of the many different ways people talk to each other.
Not all groups active on wikis or around wikis use the same way to discuss things: it can happen on wiki, on social networks, through external tools... Tell us how your group communicates.
You can read more about the overall process on mediawiki.org. If you have questions or ideas, you can leave feedback about the consultation process in the language you prefer.
Thank you! We're looking forward to talking with you.
Forslag om rebranding av Wikimedia-prosjektene rediger
Hei! Jeg har skrevet et innlegg om et forsag til rebranding av Wikimedia-prosjektene på Torget på Wikipedia – alle er hjertelig velkomne til å komme med innspill og kommentarer, spesielt de som er aktive på søsterprosjekter som Wiktionary. Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (diskusjon) 25. mar. 2019 kl. 13:32 (CET)
Read-only mode for up to 30 minutes on 11 April rediger
8. apr. 2019 kl. 12:56 (CEST)
Wikimedia Foundation Medium-Term Plan feedback request rediger
Hjelp til med å oversette til ditt språk
VIKTIG: Gjennomgang av administrative aktiviteter rediger
Hallo. En ny policy vedrørende fjerning av rettigheter for administratorer, byråkrater o.a. er nettopp trådt i kraft global community consensus (Deres nettsamfunn har fått melding om den pågående diskusjonen).
I tråd med denne policyen følger stewardene med på administrative aktiviteter på mindre wikier. Så vidt vi er kjent med, har deres wiki ingen formell prosess for å fjerne "avanserte rettigheter" ved langvarig inaktivitet. Dette innebærer at stewardene vil ordne dette i tråd med de nye admin activity review oversikter over administratoraktiviteter.
Vi har funnet at følgende brukere kan ansees inaktive (ingen redigeringer og ingen logget aktivitet i mere enn 2 år)
- Broboman (administrator)
- EivindJ (administrator)
Disse brukerne vil motta melding snart, om at de må ta det opp med wikisamfunnet om de ønsker å beholde rettighetene. Hvis henvendelsen ikke blir besvart, vil stewardene fjerne rettighetene.
Men nettsamfunnet står fritt til å skape egne prosedyrer. Det kan også ha skjedd at vi ikke har fått med oss allerede eksisterende prosedyrer. I så fall: Meld fra til stewards on Meta-Wiki slik at vi ikke kjører prosedyren på deres Wiki. Takk! Rschen7754 19. jun. 2019 kl. 04:51 (CEST)
Nye maler? rediger
Hei, jeg er ny på den Norske Wiktionary siden, men jeg ønsker å bidra med utviklingen av siden. Jeg har drevet en del med det latviske språket, men jeg merker at det blir vanskelig å bøye verb og substantiv uten maler. Går det an å spørre om noen kunne lage en mal for latviske ord, eller kan jeg gjøre det selv?
Håper jeg kan få svar, hvis dette er riktig side man kan spørre på da.
Millerutt (diskusjon) 29. jun. 2019 kl. 02:01 (CEST)
- @Millerutt: Jeg kan hjelpe deg med å skape maler i Lua, men jeg snakker ikke latvisk. Har du en ide om hva du vil? Surkål (discussion) 16. jul. 2019 kl. 23:26 (CEST)
Update on the consultation about office actions rediger
Hello all,
Last month, the Wikimedia Foundation's Trust & Safety team announced a future consultation about partial and/or temporary office actions. We want to let you know that the draft version of this consultation has now been posted on Meta.
This is a draft. It is not intended to be the consultation itself, which will be posted on Meta likely in early September. Please do not treat this draft as a consultation. Instead, we ask your assistance in forming the final language for the consultation.
For that end, we would like your input over the next couple of weeks about what questions the consultation should ask about partial and temporary Foundation office action bans and how it should be formatted. Please post it on the draft talk page. Our goal is to provide space for the community to discuss all the aspects of these office actions that need to be discussed, and we want to ensure with your feedback that the consultation is presented in the best way to encourage frank and constructive conversation.
Please visit the consultation draft on Meta-wiki and leave your comments on the draft’s talk page about what the consultation should look like and what questions it should ask.
Thank you for your input! -- The Trust & Safety team 16. aug. 2019 kl. 10:03 (CEST)
New tools and IP masking rediger
Hey everyone,
The Wikimedia Foundation wants to work on two things that affect how we patrol changes and handle vandalism and harassment. We want to make the tools that are used to handle bad edits better. We also want to get better privacy for unregistered users so their IP addresses are no longer shown to everyone in the world. We would not hide IP addresses until we have better tools for patrolling.
We have an idea of what tools could be working better and how a more limited access to IP addresses would change things, but we need to hear from more wikis. You can read more about the project on Meta and post comments and feedback. Now is when we need to hear from you to be able to give you better tools to handle vandalism, spam and harassment.
You can post in your language if you can't write in English.
Johan (WMF)21. aug. 2019 kl. 16:19 (CEST)
The consultation on partial and temporary Foundation bans just started rediger
Hello,
In a recent statement, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees requested that staff hold a consultation to "re-evaluat[e] or add community input to the two new office action policy tools (temporary and partial Foundation bans)".
Accordingly, the Foundation's Trust & Safety team invites all Wikimedians to join this consultation and give their feedback from 30 September to 30 October.
How can you help?
- Suggest how partial and temporary Foundation bans should be used, if they should (eg: On all projects, or only on a subset);
- Give ideas about how partial and temporary Foundation bans should ideally implemented, if they should be; and/or
- Propose changes to the existing Office Actions policy on partial and temporary bans.
We offer our thanks in advance for your contributions, and we hope to get as much input as possible from community members during this consultation!
Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project rediger
Hjelp til med å oversette til ditt språk
Hallo. The Readers Web team at the WMF will work on some improvements to the desktop interface over the next couple of years. The goal is to increase usability without removing any functionality. We have been inspired by changes made by volunteers, but that currently only exist as local gadgets and user scripts, prototypes, and volunteer-led skins. We would like to begin the process of bringing some of these changes into the default experience on all Wikimedia projects.
We are currently in the research stage of this project and are looking for ideas for improvements, as well as feedback on our current ideas and mockups. So far, we have performed interviews with community members at Wikimania. We have gathered lists of previous volunteer and WMF work in this area. We are examining possible technical approaches for such changes.
We would like individual feedback on the following:
- Identifying focus areas for the project we have not yet discovered
- Expanding the list of existing gadgets and user scripts that are related to providing a better desktop experience. If you can think of some of these from your wiki, please let us know
- Feedback on the ideas and mockups we have collected so far
We would also like to gather a list of wikis that would be interested in being test wikis for this project - these wikis would be the first to receive the updates once we’re ready to start building.
When giving feedback, please consider the following goals of the project:
- Make it easier for readers to focus on the content
- Provide easier access to everyday actions (e.g. search, language switching, editing)
- Put things in logical and useful places
- Increase consistency in the interface with other platforms - mobile web and the apps
- Eliminate clutter
- Plan for future growth
As well as the following constraints:
- Not touching the content - no work will be done in terms of styling templates or to the structure of page contents themselves
- Not removing any functionality - things might move around, but all navigational items and other functionality currently available by default will remain
- No drastic changes to the layout - we're taking an evolutionary approach to the changes and want the site to continue feeling familiar to readers and editors
Please give all feedback (in any language) at mw:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements
After this round of feedback, we plan on building a prototype of suggested changes based on the feedback we receive. You’ll hear from us again asking for feedback on this prototype.
Takk! Quiddity (WMF) (talk)
16. okt. 2019 kl. 09:15 (CEST)
Community Wishlist 2020 rediger
The 2020 Community Wishlist Survey is now open! This survey is the process where communities decide what the Community Tech team should work on over the next year. We encourage everyone to submit proposals until the deadline on November 11, 2019, or comment on other proposals to help make them better.
This year, we’re exclusively focusing on smaller projects (i.e., Wikibooks, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikisource, Wikiversity, Wikispecies, Wikivoyage, and Wikinews). We want to help these projects and provide meaningful improvements to diverse communities. If you’re a member of any of these projects, please participate in the survey! To submit proposals, see the guidelines on the survey page. You can write proposals in any language, and we will translate them for you. Thank you, and we look forward to seeing your proposals!
Hei! Siden 2017 har interwikilenker til no.wikiquote.org fra andre språk vist «Norsk» i sidemenyen i stedet for «Norsk bokmål», som var status for 2017 (det samme har også gjeldt Wikipedia på bokmål). I dag sendte jeg inn en konfigurasjonsendring for å fikse dette for Wikipedia, og tok i samme slengen med Wikiquote og Wiktionary, men det var kanskje litt overilt. Jeblad nevnte at hovedsiden her på Wiktionary bare nevner norsk og ikke bokmål spesifikt («Den norske utgaven […]»), og har jo et poeng der. Så spørsmålet er hva som bør være visningsnavnet på denne Wiktionary-utgaven i språklista på andre utgaver? «Norsk» eller «Norsk bokmål»? Det finnes jo også en Wiktionaory på nynorsk, uten at det nødvendigvis betyr at denne utgaven bare er på bokmål. Jon Harald Søby (diskusjon) 16. des. 2019 kl. 15:10 (CET)
- Dette prosjektet er «norsk», se for eksempel oppslagene ein og ikkje. Det er også et eget prosjekt for nynorsk, så det er ikke gitt hva som vil skje senere. Tror med fordel Mewasul kan spørres om råd. Jeblad-demo (diskusjon)
- Hei @Jeblad, Jon Harald Søby! Dette prosjektet er på norsk, alle (3) målformer kan brukes og forekommer. Det er en overvekt av bokmål her, som antagelig reflekterer at dette er hovedmålet til de mest aktive (og de noe mindre aktive kanskje). At vi har med nynorsk har en litt historisk kontekst; det har vært bidragsytere her med nynorsk som hovedmål, som ønsket en felles utgave istedenfor to separate. Nå er ikke dette tilfelle for øyeblikket, men ingen av de som bidrar her virker å ha et aktivt ønske om å endre dette (personlig hadde jeg gjerne sett en aktiv nynorsk-del av dette prosjektet). Så konklusjon, dette er definitivt norsk og ikke norsk (bokmål). Mewasul (diskusjon) 17. des. 2019 kl. 09:45 (CET)
- @Mewasul, Jeblad: Takk! Da lar vi det stå som det står (altså: «norsk» og ikke «norsk bokmål») uten å gjøre noe mer med det. :-) Jon Harald Søby (diskusjon) 17. des. 2019 kl. 10:31 (CET)